What is your argument?

Read the following article from the New York Times and post an opinion about the death penalty. Do you think that governments should use this extreme form of punishment? Why or why not? What is your argument?

State-Sponsored Horror in Oklahoma

At 6:36 p.m. on Tuesday in McAlester, Okla., Clayton Lockett started kicking his leg, then twitching, then writhing and moaning in agony, and everyone watching knew something had gone terribly wrong. Mr. Lockett, a convicted murderer, was strapped to a gurney in the death chamber of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary, about to be executed by lethal injection, but the untested combination of a sedative and a paralyzing agent had failed.

According to an eyewitness account by a reporter for The Tulsa World, Mr. Lockett tried to raise himself up, mumbled the word “man,” and was in obvious pain. Officials hastily closed the blinds on the chamber and told reporters that the execution had been stopped because of a “vein failure.” But at 7:06, the inmate was pronounced dead of a heart attack.

This horrific scene — the very definition of cruel and unusual punishment — should never have happened. The Oklahoma Supreme Court tried to stop it last week, concerned that the state refused to reveal the origin of the deadly cocktail. But several lawmakers threatened to impeach the justices, and Gov. Mary Fallin blindly ignored the warning signs and ordered the execution to proceed. (She said it was outside the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, which normally deals with civil matters.)

On Wednesday afternoon, a few hours after her employees tortured a man to death, Ms. Fallin suddenly showed an interest in execution procedures.She ordered an independent review of the injection protocol, halting further state killings until the investigation is complete.

She should have gone much further and followed other governors and legislatures in banning executions, recognizing that the American administration of death does not function. Mr. Lockett’s ordeal, along with the botched deaths of other inmates around the country, showed there is no reliable and humane method of execution. As Gov. John Kitzhaber of Oregon said in 2011: “I refuse to be a part of this compromised and inequitable system any longer; and I will not allow further executions while I am governor.”

Seven states have put the death penalty on hold over the last five years because of issues of fairness or methods; another 11 states are debating the issue. Even in states where the death penalty is applied, the number of executions has fallen sharply since 2009. Republicans in Oklahoma seemed so eager to buck this tide that they ignored what happened during a January execution, when an inmate named Michael Lee Wilson said “I feel my whole body burning” just before the drugs killed him.

See the rest of the article here: State-Sponsored Horror in Oklahoma


3 thoughts on “What is your argument?

  1. In my opinion, I disagree with this opinion. I think the execution should continue because inmates have to a tone for their sins. It’s important to affront and think about the dignity of human beings. However, in this article, public opinion places focused on one-side opinion for inmates. Why is public opinion considered the dignity of the victims involeved in many crimes? I think public opinion should be better to respect the vitim’s dignity as same as inmates. Because the diginity of human beings are equal, not inequity. If public opinion insists on quitting execution, it should be thinking about both sides of the dignity of inmates and victims. There’re many reasons to be executed for inmates, I think it stands to reason and makes sense. That’s why the execution should continue.

    • How do we know what the victims want? These victims are often dead; so, we cannot ask them for their opinion for how to best punish their attackers. Perhaps, the victims do not want their attackers to be killed. Perhaps, they want their attackers to be forgiven. So, how do we go about “respecting the victim’s dignity”?

      • It is not about what the victims want, it is about eliminating the threat of our society. Moreover, I do not think passing sentence of life imprisonment on murders is a good solution. First, if murders are put in low-quality prison, it is somehow terrible than death since they lose their freedom and suffer a lot, so is it humanity (case A)? However, if murders are put in good-quality prison, we have a burden on our economy, and imagine that you did something really bad and you get a reward, is it fair (case B)? For example, someone murders people to stole their money, and then that one live inside the prison by our tax while many people killing no one have to work hard to get by and feed the murderers. Furthermore, death penalty is like a warning for people to avoid doing harmful things for our society. It is just a punishment for people who do very bad things and it is humanity since the murderers do not have to suffer for a long time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s